You are here:
The Club of Ugly Children

The Club of Ugly Children

2019

Director

Jonathan Elbers

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

“Keep it clean!” – The new president is serious about that, including looks. When Paul, whose large jug ears are quite apparent on class photo day, and some of the other “ugly” kids are taken on a surprise trip, they realize that the president wants to hide them away. On the run, Paul is helped by Sara, one of the “pretty” kids. They start an underground club to fight against the president. The movement soon turns into a revolution. The kids show the world that even children can rise up – and that you don’t have to be “pretty” to be a hero!

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.5/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on physical appearance and social status rather than queer identity.

Gender Representation

Good

Sara, a member of the 'pretty' class, subverts social boundaries by siding with the marginalized group. This positioning grants agency to children who typically fall outside traditional social archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no specific information regarding the racial or ethnic composition of the cast. The narrative focuses on aesthetic dichotomies rather than ethnic backgrounds.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story critiques systemic control and institutional oppression. It frames a revolution against a leader who enforces aesthetic conformity, favoring grassroots organization over top-down mandates.

Disability Representation

Good

Physical atypicality, such as Paul's prominent ears, serves as a symbol of resistance. The film grants these characters agency, avoiding common tropes by making them the heroes of a revolution.

Strengths

  • Challenges aesthetic hierarchies by centering 'unconventional' children as heroes.
  • Subverts traditional social orders through characters like Sara who cross class lines.
  • Rejects 'inspiration porn' by giving physically atypical characters full political agency.
  • Critiques systemic control and the enforcement of social conformity.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative characters.
  • Provides no verifiable information regarding racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Focuses primarily on physical appearance rather than broader intersectional identities.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a narrative critique of aesthetic perfectionism and systemic conformity. It succeeds in disrupting traditional social hierarchies by empowering those deemed 'other' to dismantle oppressive leadership. While the story provides a strong framework for challenging beauty standards, it lacks specific details regarding racial and LGBTQ+ representation. The focus remains heavily on physical appearance as the primary driver of social division. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its subversion of normative standards, transforming physical outliers into political agents of change.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.