You are here:

Paradise

Paradise

Representation Score

7.4/10

Good

2023

Director

Alexander Abaturov

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Paradise serves as a significant departure from Western-centric documentary norms by centering a specific Siberian landscape and its inhabitants. The film provides a necessary perspective on environmental crisis outside of the traditional Western gaze. While the work excels at geographical and cultural decentralization, it lacks explicit engagement with identity-based politics. There is little evidence of intentional narrative subversion regarding gender or LGBTQ+ identities. The documentary functions primarily as an observational study of a natural disaster, focusing on the subarctic taiga and the immediate threat of wildfires to the Shologon village.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Paradise have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The documentary focuses on ecological issues rather than LGBTQ+ identity politics. There are no specific LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives addressing the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Paradise portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on the wildfire crisis in Shologon village. It lacks evidence regarding the distribution of control among genders or challenges to traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Paradise?

Good

The film provides meaningful representation by centering on the Sakha republic in Siberia. It shifts the lens away from Western-centric narratives toward a localized, non-Western geographic context.

How does Paradise represent religion and culture?

Good

The film prioritizes the relationship between humanity and nature over industrial progress. Its focus on remote, non-Western regions inherently critiques global structures contributing to extreme weather.

Does Paradise include disability representation?

Fair

There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of neurodivergence or physical disabilities. It remains unclear if individuals with disabilities are given real power during the wildfire.

Present on Screen

  • Centers a non-Western, indigenous/regional population in the Sakha republic.
  • Shifts the documentary lens away from traditional Anglo-Saxon geographic perspectives.
  • Provides a platform for localized ability to act amidst global climate shifts.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit engagement with LGBTQ+ or gender-based identity politics.
  • Provides no clear evidence regarding the representation of neurodivergence or physical disabilities.
  • Does not offer specific details regarding the gendered distribution of ability to act among subjects.

Official Synopsis

In 2021, an extreme heatwave gave rise to huge wildfires in the vast subarctic forests of Sakha, a northeastern republic in Siberia. The village of Shologon lies in this taiga landscape, shrouded in orange smoke and black ash. The forest is burning and the flames are approaching fast.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.