You are here:

General Massacre

Name: General Massacre
Director: Burr Jerger
Released: 1973
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

2.8/10

Limited

1973

Director

Burr Jerger

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

General Massacre is a narrow character study focusing on the psychological erosion of a veteran. The film explores the blurred lines between combat and civilian life but does so through a limited lens. While the protagonist's worldview critiques statecraft and patriotism, the film lacks depth in representing various identities. It focuses almost exclusively on a singular, traditional masculine perspective, failing to engage with a broad demographic range. Ultimately, the work serves more as a study of individual trauma than a diverse social narrative, offering little representation beyond the central male figure's fragmented reality.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does General Massacre have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisgender identities. The narrative focuses solely on the veteran's psychological state.

How does General Massacre portray gender?

Limited

The story revolves around a single male protagonist who embodies traditional masculine traits through a strict, command-oriented identity. Female characters do not play a significant role.

How racially and ethnically diverse is General Massacre?

Limited

The narrative adheres to a conventional Western military framework without showcasing a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon viewpoints.

How does General Massacre represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film presents a cynical view of the relationship between civilians and the state. It challenges societal norms by depicting politics as an extension of warfare.

Does General Massacre include disability representation?

Limited

The protagonist exhibits behaviors indicative of neurodivergence or untreated PTSD. However, his condition serves primarily as a plot device rather than a nuanced portrayal.

Present on Screen

Offers a cynical critique of the relationship between politics and warfare.
Challenges the 'heroic veteran' stereotype by highlighting psychological fragmentation.

Limited or Absent

Fails to provide multi-layered depth or diverse character perspectives.
Depends heavily on a singular, traditional masculine archetype.
Uses potential neurodivergence primarily as a plot device.

Official Synopsis

The story focuses on a veteran (the General) who served the military during WWII, Vietnam and the Korean War. He has quite a few alarming conceptions about warfare ("politics are the extension of war", “Civilians are as much the enemy as men in uniform”…) When he returns to his estate in Antwerp, he continues to live under the impression of being in command of his troops and hikes into the nearby woods fully armoured.

How are these scores produced? →