You are here:

Anomalous

Name: Anomalous
Director: Hugo Stuven Casasnovas
Released: 2016
Duration: 100 min

2016

Director

Hugo Stuven Casasnovas

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A young schizophrenic who felt threatened by a presence he was unable to define turns up gruesomely dead in his bathtub

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.1/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film offers no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. There is no visible critique of heteronormativity within the narrative.

Gender Representation

Minimal

The story centers on a singular male protagonist. There is no information regarding female characters or the subversion of gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The synopsis provides no details regarding the racial composition of the cast. It does not indicate the use of race-bent casting or metaphorical diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

While the film explores mental health, it lacks indications of critiques regarding religion, capitalism, or Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Fair

The protagonist's schizophrenia provides a baseline for neurodivergent representation. However, it is unclear if this condition is treated with nuance or used as a horror trope.

Strengths

The film provides a central focus on a neurodivergent protagonist navigating schizophrenia.

Areas for Improvement

The narrative lacks racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ diversity.
There is no evidence of systemic or cultural critique within the story.
The portrayal of mental health may risk relying on genre tropes.

AI Analysis

Anomalous is a localized psychological horror film that prioritizes a singular, character-driven narrative over systemic social critique. The plot focuses heavily on the internal experience of a protagonist navigating schizophrenia. Because the scope is limited to an individual's psychological struggle, the film lacks the breadth required for intersectional complexity. There is no evidence of diverse casting or the subversion of traditional social hierarchies. Ultimately, the film's diversity is restricted to its central focus on neurodivergence, leaving other categories of representation entirely unaddressed.

How are these scores produced? →