New Showbiz

You are here:
Good Guys Go to Heaven, Bad Guys Go to Pattaya

Good Guys Go to Heaven, Bad Guys Go to Pattaya

2016

Director

Franck Gastambide

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Franky and Krimo dream of leaving the grey grime of their neighborhood behind and of traveling to the famous and diabolical Thai beach resort of Pattaya. To get there cheaply, the two friends have the crazy idea of registering, unbeknownst to him, the local little person for the Thai Dwarf Boxing World Championship. But what was supposed to be a dream vacation will transform into the most insane and dangerous adventure of their lives.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film focuses on male-centric friendship and heteronormative bonding. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities within the narrative.

Gender Representation

Limited

The plot is driven almost entirely by two male protagonists. Female agency is notably absent, as the central conflict revolves around a male-dominated sporting event.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

While the Thai setting introduces non-Western environments, the story relies on the protagonists exploiting a local individual. This suggests a tourist gaze rather than deep cultural blending.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The narrative leans into Western tropes of the 'chaos vacation' and consumerist escapism. The portrayal of the setting as 'diabolical' may rely on reductive cultural stereotypes.

Disability Representation

Limited

A person with dwarfism serves as a central plot device for the protagonists' scheme. This risks reducing the character to a functional tool rather than a nuanced individual.

Strengths

  • The cross-cultural setting of Thailand introduces non-Western environments and diverse locations into the comedic journey.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film relies on using physical disability as a plot device, which lacks character agency.
  • The narrative lacks female agency, focusing almost exclusively on male protagonists.
  • The portrayal of the Thai setting risks utilizing reductive cultural tropes and the tourist gaze.
  • There is a lack of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.

AI Analysis

The film operates as a conventional buddy comedy that prioritizes slapstick and situational chaos over progressive representation. It relies heavily on established comedic tropes, particularly using physical difference as a primary engine for the plot. Rather than subverting social hierarchies, the narrative reinforces traditional power dynamics. The focus remains on male-driven escapism and the exploitation of local elements for comedic effect. Ultimately, the work lacks intersectional depth, functioning within mainstream comedic traditions that favor predictable character archetypes over nuanced sociological exploration.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Porn in the Hood

Porn in the Hood

2012

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.