You are here:
Corrupt

Corrupt

2015

TV-14

Director

Curtis Crawford

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A district attorney asks a forensic accountant (Nicole de Boer) to investigate the murder of a key witness.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.4/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The procedural focus suggests a conventional social framework.

Gender Representation

Fair

Nicole de Boer leads the film as a high-agency forensic accountant. This placement of a woman in a position of intellectual authority disrupts traditional passive roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

There is no specific information regarding the racial or ethnic composition of the cast. The film appears to follow standard industry demographics for crime thrillers.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative focuses on institutional integrity and the restoration of justice. It does not provide evidence of a critique of Western legal institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The available context provides no evidence regarding the inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • The film features a female protagonist in a high-agency, professional role.
  • Nicole de Boer's character provides a model of intellectual authority in a male-dominated genre.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks verifiable evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative perspectives.
  • The narrative does not address disability or provide diverse cultural critiques.

AI Analysis

Corrupt functions as a standard crime thriller that finds its primary strength in gender representation. By centering a female forensic accountant, the film grants a woman significant intellectual agency within a complex legal system. However, the film lacks depth in other areas of identity. There is no visible evidence of racial diversity, LGBTQ+ representation, or disability inclusion. The narrative seems to follow a traditional procedural structure rather than challenging systemic norms. Ultimately, while the protagonist breaks certain gendered tropes, the film remains within conventional cinematic boundaries, lacking the intersectional breadth required for a higher diversity score.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.