You are here:

The Trouble with Angels

Name: The Trouble with Angels
Director: Ida Lupino
Released: 1966
Duration: 112 min

Representation Score

3.5/10

Limited

1966

Director

Ida Lupino

Runtime

112 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Ida Lupino’s direction provides a significant layer of complexity by disrupting patriarchal cinematic structures. The film succeeds in creating a unique power struggle that exists entirely within a female-centric space, focusing on the negotiation between autonomy and authority. However, the film remains limited by the social norms of its time. The lack of racial and LGBTQ+ diversity results in a homogeneous environment that lacks broader representation. Ultimately, the work is a character study of institutional friction. It trades broad social diversity for a nuanced exploration of how individuals navigate restrictive, traditional systems.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Trouble with Angels have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film operates within a framework that assumes everyone is straight or cisgender. It focuses on platonic adolescent bonding and the tension between youth and religious discipline rather than queer identity.

How does The Trouble with Angels portray gender?

Good

The narrative disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering on a female-driven ecosystem. Power dynamics shift to female intellect and the complexities of female leadership and rebellion.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Trouble with Angels?

Limited

The cast is predominantly white and homogeneous, reflecting the mid-1960s cinematic landscape. It does not utilize diverse casting to challenge the social norms of the era.

How does The Trouble with Angels represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film critiques rigid institutionalism through the friction between students and the convent. It frames the conflict as a maturation process regarding individual control over their lives.

Does The Trouble with Angels include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities. No such characters serve as central arcs within the narrative.

Present on Screen

The film challenges male-dominated hierarchies by centering the entire power struggle within a female ecosystem.
Ida Lupino’s direction offers a nuanced exploration of female leadership and institutional friction.
The narrative provides a sophisticated critique of rigid religious and systemic structures.

Limited or Absent

The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, remaining predominantly white and homogeneous.
There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer-coded character arcs.
The film lacks any meaningful depiction of characters with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Mary and her friend, Rachel, are new students at St. Francis Academy, a boarding school run by the iron fist of Mother Superior. The immature teens grow bored and begin playing pranks on both the unsuspecting nuns and their unpleasant classmates, becoming a constant thorn in Mother Superior's side. However, as the years pass, Mary and Rachel slowly mature and begin to see the nuns in a different light.

How are these scores produced? →