More Sexy Canterbury Tales
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The First Turn-On!!
1983
RDirector
Michael Herz, Lloyd Kaufman
Runtime
88 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A group of teenage summer campers and one counselor share the stories of their first sexual experiences when an avalanche traps them in a cave...
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.6/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on adolescent sexual awakening, a theme that often allows for non-heteronormative expression. However, there is no explicit evidence of queer intimacy or specific LGBTQ+ identities within the narrative.
Gender Representation
Teenagers and a counselor navigate sexual experiences, potentially disrupting traditional hierarchies. The characters appear to possess agency over their bodily autonomy, challenging authoritative adult roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film lacks specific details regarding the ethnic makeup of its ensemble cast. Given the era and genre, there is a risk of a homogeneous cast lacking significant racial variety.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The cave setting acts as a microcosm that strips away societal structures like family and law. The focus on sexual experiences suggests a rejection of traditional religious morality.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities present in the film.
Strengths
- The narrative structure effectively deconstructs traditional social hierarchies and moral decorum.
- The setting serves as a powerful microcosm for individual liberation and the rejection of societal norms.
- The film explores themes of bodily autonomy and adolescent agency.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer agency.
- There is a notable absence of verifiable racial and ethnic diversity within the ensemble.
- The narrative provides no evidence of characters with disabilities.
AI Analysis
The film operates as a transgressive comedy that prioritizes the deconstruction of social decorum and conventional morality. By trapping characters in a cave, the narrative removes them from institutional oversight, favoring individual liberation over traditional Western values. While the creative leadership suggests an intent to disrupt social hierarchies, the film lacks verifiable data regarding racial and intersectional identities. This creates a gap between its subversive potential and its actual demographic representation. Ultimately, the work excels at cultural subversion through its rejection of social taboos, but remains limited by a lack of explicit diversity in its cast and character identities.
Similar Movies
Secrets of a French Maid
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
I'm Going to Live by Myself
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
Get Lucky
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.7 out of 10
Fancy a Woman
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
The Amorous Sisters
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Italian Sex
1974
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
Caution to the Wind
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
La collegiale
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Controsesso
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
Love Shack
2010
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
Sex After Six
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.