New Showbiz

You are here:
School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In

School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In

2016

Director

Kim Dae-seong-I

Runtime

98 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

During the late period of the Joseon, Jae-won, Man-ki, Deok-ho and foolish Chil-deuk are the only ones at the village school. The school is going through a rough patch so the school teacher visits his girlfriend the gisaeng and suggests to his students that they bring in female students. So-hyang and the other girls brighten up the mood of the school and more male students sign up. Yeon-hwa is jealous of Jae-won and So-hyang who fell in love with each other at first sight. She confesses her love to him but he doesn't give her any attention so she tells him So-hyang's secret. On the other hand, the teacher's wife is surprised to see a man wearing a mask peeking at her body but is surprised to the see the size of the hole in the pumpkin he dropped. Not happy with her husband's night skills, she calls in the male students one by one to find out but the pumpkin belongs to no one... To whom does the hole belong to?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.1/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative pairings. The romantic focus remains on the central tension between Jae-won and So-hyang.

Gender Representation

Good

Female characters drive the plot, with the arrival of gisaeng students revitalizing the male-dominated school. The teacher's wife also displays agency by investigating her husband's domestic inadequacies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Set in the Joseon era, the cast is culturally homogeneous. However, the inclusion of the gisaeng class adds layers of internal social stratification to the period setting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative subverts traditional Confucian structures by prioritizing human impulses over strict moralism. It uses comedy to critique the rigidity of historical educational institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed in the narrative.

Strengths

  • Disrupts traditional gender hierarchies by centering female characters as catalysts for change.
  • Uses the historical setting to critique and subvert rigid Confucian social structures.
  • Explores internal social stratification through the inclusion of the gisaeng class.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative romantic pairings.
  • Provides no visible or invisible portrayals of disability.
  • Maintains a culturally homogeneous cast consistent with its specific historical setting.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a period comedy that uses the Joseon era to disrupt traditional social hierarchies. It finds its strength in gender dynamics, using female characters to catalyze institutional change and challenge domestic power structures. While the film offers a nuanced departure from conservative historical depictions through its focus on social fluidity, it remains limited by a lack of queer or disability-focused narratives. The representation is primarily centered on class and gender within a specific ethnic context. Ultimately, the work succeeds in using satire to poke fun at rigid social orders, even if it does not engage with broader intersectional identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.