You are here:

School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In

Name: School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In
Director: Kim Dae-seong-I
Released: 2016
Duration: 98 min

Representation Score

5.0/10

Fair

2016

Director

Kim Dae-seong-I

Runtime

98 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film serves as a period comedy that leverages the Joseon era to challenge traditional social hierarchies. Its strength lies in gender dynamics, where female characters act as catalysts for institutional change and challenge established power structures. While the film provides a nuanced departure from conventional historical representations through its focus on social fluidity, it remains constrained by a lack of engagement with broader multi-layered identities such as LGBTQ+ and disability issues. The representation centers on class and gender within a specific cultural context. Ultimately, the work succeeds in using satire to mock rigid social orders, even though it does not delve into diverse multi-layered identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not explicitly depict LGBTQ+ identities or relationships outside of heterosexual norms. The main romantic tension revolves around Jae-won and So-hyang.

How does School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In portray gender?

Good

Female characters play key roles in driving the plot. The arrival of gisaeng students brings new energy to the male-dominated school environment. The teacher's wife also takes action to address her husband's shortcomings.

How racially and ethnically diverse is School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In?

Fair

Set in the Joseon era, the cast is ethnically uniform. However, the inclusion of the gisaeng class introduces layers of internal social hierarchy.

How does School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In represent religion and culture?

Fair

The narrative challenges traditional Confucian structures by emphasizing human emotions over strict moral codes. It uses humor to critique the rigidity of historical educational systems.

Does School Of Youth 2: The Unofficial History of the Gisaeng Break-In include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed in the film.

Present on Screen

Centers female characters as drivers of change, disrupting traditional gender hierarchies.
Uses the historical setting to critique and challenge rigid Confucian social structures.
Explores internal social stratification through the inclusion of the gisaeng class.

Limited or Absent

Does not include explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight-centered romantic relationships.
Does not feature any visible or invisible portrayals of disability.
Maintains a culturally uniform cast reflective of its specific historical setting.

Official Synopsis

During the late period of the Joseon, Jae-won, Man-ki, Deok-ho and foolish Chil-deuk are the only ones at the village school. The school is going through a rough patch so the school teacher visits his girlfriend the gisaeng and suggests to his students that they bring in female students. So-hyang and the other girls brighten up the mood of the school and more male students sign up. Yeon-hwa is jealous of Jae-won and So-hyang who fell in love with each other at first sight. She confesses her love to him but he doesn't give her any attention so she tells him So-hyang's secret. On the other hand, the teacher's wife is surprised to see a man wearing a mask peeking at her body but is surprised to the see the size of the hole in the pumpkin he dropped. Not happy with her husband's night skills, she calls in the male students one by one to find out but the pumpkin belongs to no one... To whom does the hole belong to?

How are these scores produced? →