You are here:

Flowers of Evil

Name: Flowers of Evil
Director: Antti J. Jokinen
Released: 2016
Duration: 105 min

Representation Score

5.2/10

Fair

2016

Director

Antti J. Jokinen

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Flowers of Evil is a gritty social realist drama that explores the breakdown of the modern welfare state. Using a reverse-chronological structure, the film traces the descent from civil unrest back to its socio-economic roots in eastern Helsinki. The film's main strength lies in its unvarnished critique of the fractures within a multicultural society. It avoids a sanitized view of social cohesion, instead highlighting the tension between immigrant populations and established state structures. However, the narrative focus is narrow. The film prioritizes ethnic and class-based conflicts, leaving little room for representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disability.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Flowers of Evil have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any visible LGBTQ+ characters or stories. It focuses more on class and ethnic issues rather than sexual or gender identity politics.

How does Flowers of Evil portray gender?

Fair

The story revolves around a traditional Finnish family man. While he adheres to patriarchal roles, the chaotic social environment challenges the effectiveness of traditional male leadership.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Flowers of Evil?

Good

The narrative highlights the conflict within a multicultural urban area. It emphasizes characters dealing with ethnic identity and systemic exclusion amid social unrest.

How does Flowers of Evil represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film criticizes Western social stability by showing state institutions under attack. It portrays social dysfunction as a symptom of systemic failure and poverty.

Does Flowers of Evil include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information available to assess the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

Provides a raw, unsanitized critique of systemic inequality and social instability.
Centers the voices of underrepresented and disenfranchised groups within a multicultural setting.
Effectively uses tension between diverse populations and state authority to drive the plot.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth narratives.
Offers no visible focus on physical or neurodivergent disability representation.
Relies on a traditional patriarchal focal point that may limit gender diversity.

Official Synopsis

Unrest breaks out in eastern Helsinki as a Finnish family man gets hospitalized in the summer of 2015. Gangs of young people are burning down cars and public buildings, confronting the security guards and the riot police. The narrative goes backwards, towards the riots which mark the end of our movie. As the story begins, the unrest is still bubbling under, ready to explode any time. Vandalism and robbery are not uncommon in the suburbs; neither is violence towards the police and the security guards. Frustration, alienation, isolation and poverty corrode the asphalt surface of the multicultured society, otherwise relatively harmonious.

How are these scores produced? →