
All for Two
2013

2017
Director
Rasmus Heide
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Nikolaj is now an civilian, and likes his new job as preschool-teacher. Timo is seperate from his Wife Lonnine, and the social workers threats to break his rigtg to see his son Heino. If is not pay five yeas "child-support-money" with he has not paid. One day the brother father Arno, dies and they find out the have an unknowen brother in Italy, with is the sole seated legacy to the motorcycle, and the heist goes to steal it.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative focuses on the domestic struggles of Timo and his separation from his wife. There is no explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities within the primary character arcs.
Gender Representation
The film deconstructs traditional masculinity by showing Timo struggling with systemic pressures and co-parenting. Nikolaj’s role as a preschool teacher further disrupts conventional archetypes by placing a man in a nurturing profession.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story centers on a homogeneous social unit within a localized Scandinavian setting. There is no evidence of a non-white majority cast or race-bent casting in the provided context.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot critiques Western institutions by highlighting friction between individuals and state-run social structures. The heist element introduces moral relativism, prioritizing individual agency over strict adherence to legal or social norms.
Disability Representation
No visible or invisible disabilities are portrayed among the central characters. There is no evidence of neurodivergence or physical disability presented in the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
All for Three functions as a character-driven comedy that explores social dysfunction and systemic friction. It succeeds in subverting gendered labor hierarchies and critiquing the authority of state institutions like social services. However, the film's progressive impact is limited by a lack of intersectional breadth. The narrative remains centered on a homogeneous social unit, offering little visibility for racial or LGBTQ+ identities. Ultimately, the film prioritizes a localized exploration of family and masculinity over a broad, diverse representation of modern society.

2013

1976

2021

2021

1997

2000

1984

1995

1989

2005

1982

2021
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.