You are here:

Dick: The Documentary

Dick: The Documentary

Representation Score

6.2/10

Good

2013

Director

Brian Fender

Runtime

50 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Brian Fender’s DIY documentary uses a grassroots approach to dismantle social taboos surrounding anatomy and masculinity. By recruiting volunteers via Craigslist, the film bypasses traditional industry gatekeepers to capture raw, unmediated human experiences. The work succeeds in disrupting traditional hierarchies by granting subjects a significant role in defining their own realities. It moves beyond polished, commercialized spectacles to focus on the vulnerability beneath various male archetypes. While the film excels in exploring gender identity and non-cisgender perspectives, it lacks specific evidence regarding racial composition or disability representation. This creates a profile of high inclusivity in identity but moderate clarity in demographic breadth.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Dick: The Documentary have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film includes transgender individuals, integrating non-cisgender identities into a candid dialogue. This inclusion challenges assumptions that everyone is straight or cisgender and treats underrepresented voices with humanity and curiosity.

How does Dick: The Documentary portray gender?

Good

The documentary deconstructs masculinity by stripping away the social armor of various male archetypes. It challenges the stoic male cliché by prioritizing emotional transparency and physical vulnerability.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Dick: The Documentary?

Fair

The film aims for a broad cross-section of society, suggesting an intent to move beyond a homogeneous demographic. However, specific evidence of diverse casting remains unconfirmed.

How does Dick: The Documentary represent religion and culture?

Good

The narrative prioritizes individual truth and humanism over religious dogma. By featuring subjects like monks and secular professionals, it explores human nature through a subjective, secular lens.

Does Dick: The Documentary include disability representation?

Minimal

There is insufficient evidence to confirm the presence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities portrayed with a significant role in driving the story.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges assumptions that everyone is straight or cisgender by explicitly including transgender individuals in the dialogue.
  • Challenges traditional masculine clichés by emphasizing emotional transparency and physical vulnerability.
  • Utilizes a DIY methodology that prioritizes authentic human experience over polished, institutional narratives.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit evidence of diverse racial or ethnic representation among the subjects.
  • Provides no clear indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • The focus remains heavily centered on male archetypes, limiting broader gender diversity.

Official Synopsis

In August 2008, filmmaker Brian Fender posted an add on Craigslist to solicit volunteers for a documentary project. He invited "subjects" into his living room to strip down and reveal themselves physically and emotionally through personal stories about their relationship to their penises. Fender interviewed a vast cross-section of anonymous, naked men about their prized appendage: from monks to transsexuals to ex-marines to designers, ranging in age from 21 to 80. Hoping to demystify, illuminate, and even celebrate this "member" in our society, this DIY documentary is a candid exploration of what it means to have a dick.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.