New Showbiz

You are here:
Annapolis

Annapolis

2006

PG-13

Runtime

108 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Jake Huard, from a shipbuilders family, promised his dying mother he'ld make it to Anapolis Naval Academy. Thanks to tenaciously bugging a Congressman, he's selected despite dubious grades. Once inside, Jake soon proves sub-standard academically. Constantly challenged to his limits, repeatedly made the 'over-cocky' reason for the entire class to suffer, Jake nearly quits, but after facing his utterly un-supportive father's gloating returns just in time. Stubborn Jake finds support withs mates as well as Senor Ali, his lover-to-be, and a discipline he may excel in: the 'brigade' boxing tournament, open to all ranks.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. The central romantic arc focuses on a relationship between the protagonist and a female civilian character, offering no queer narratives.

Gender Representation

Limited

Narrative dynamics center on masculine hierarchies and traditional male archetypes. While the female lead provides emotional impetus, she remains a relatively passive figure within the primary plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The midshipman corps reflects a modern military context through a diverse cast. However, the story remains focused on the protagonist, with diverse characters functioning within established social hierarchies.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story emphasizes Western institutional values, duty, and military discipline. It rewards personal responsibility and integration into collective structures rather than exploring diverse cultural perspectives.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no significant focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Physical challenges are framed through athletic and academic performance rather than the navigation of neurodivergence or disability.

Strengths

  • The midshipman corps features a degree of racial diversity reflecting a modern military context.
  • The film offers a nuanced look at the psychological pressures and vulnerabilities of masculine leadership roles.

Areas for Improvement

  • The female lead occupies a passive role, limiting gendered agency within the plot.
  • The narrative lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
  • There is no meaningful focus on disability or neurodivergence within the character arcs.

AI Analysis

Annapolis is a traditionalist coming-of-age drama that prioritizes institutional stability and masculine archetypes. The film's structure reinforces established hierarchies, focusing heavily on the protagonist's journey through a male-dominated military environment. While the ensemble provides a moderate level of racial inclusion that reflects a modern military, the narrative does not use this diversity to drive systemic change. Instead, the characters exist within a rigid, conventional social landscape. Ultimately, the film adheres to conventional romantic and cultural structures. It emphasizes Western values of duty and discipline, leaving little room for non-cisnormative identities or diverse cultural explorations.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Bloodsport

Bloodsport

1988

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.