Before the Rooster Crows
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.2 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Red Phallus
2019
Not RatedDirector
Tashi Gyeltshen
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Sangai, a teenage girl living with her father in a village of inland Bhutan, is not happy with her father, who makes wooden phalluses, believed to have mysterious power, and playing a festival clown with a red mask at a local festival. She reluctantly delivers the phalluses to neighbors but she is followed by dozens of men with red masks and costumes when walking through the hill. Conflict and tension grows between the father, who has concerns about his successor, and Sangai, who has a clandestine relationship with a married man.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
6.6/10
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film explores social transgression through clandestine relationships. While it touches on non-normative dynamics, it lacks explicit markers of queer identity.
Gender Representation
Sangai serves as a central figure of agency, challenging patriarchal authority. Her complex desires move the narrative away from submissive feminine tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story provides deep representation of Bhutanese identity. It uses specific folk traditions to avoid Western-centric storytelling norms.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film examines the tension between individual truth and communal tradition. It frames local customs as sources of personal conflict.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters navigating physical or mental health conditions within the narrative.
Strengths
- Strong cultural specificity through the use of Bhutanese folk traditions and local iconography.
- Effective subversion of traditional gender hierarchies by centering a female protagonist with significant agency.
- Exploration of the tension between individual autonomy and communal social expectations.
Areas for Improvement
- Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ identity markers or clear queer representation.
- Absence of characters navigating physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions.
- Limited exploration of diverse social identities beyond the central Bhutanese cultural context.
AI Analysis
The film succeeds in providing a culturally specific lens, utilizing Bhutanese iconography to ground its drama in a unique setting. By centering on Sangai, the story prioritizes female agency and the friction caused by individual desires against established social roles. However, the narrative lacks explicit representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disability. While it explores social transgression, it does not provide clear markers for queer characters, leaving that dimension of diversity largely unaddressed.
Similar Movies
Staff Only
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.7 out of 10
A Wedding
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.4 out of 10
3 Faces
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.1 out of 10
Wolf and Sheep
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.2 out of 10
Madeinusa
2006
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.6 out of 10
Times and Winds
2006
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.6 out of 10
Sand Storm
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.2 out of 10
Seide
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.4 out of 10
Lingui, the Sacred Bonds
2021
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.4 out of 10
Jouliks
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.8 out of 10
Looking for Venera
2022
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.9 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.