You are here:
That's What She Said

That's What She Said

2012

R

Director

Carrie Preston

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Longtime best friends Bebe and DeeDee are both wrestling with love. Bebe has met someone new and is in the exuberant phase of a budding romance. DeeDee is trying to move on from someone she can’t forget – mostly in destructive ways. As Bebe waits for the perpetually late DeeDee at their favorite coffee shop, she meets Clementine, a distraught young woman with love problems of her own. With Clementine in tow, Bebe and DeeDee soon embark on the kind of outrageous misadventure that only New York City can offer.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores romantic volatility and unconventional relationship structures through its central friendships. While the narrative hints at non-traditional social spaces, it lacks explicit confirmation of specific queer identities.

Gender Representation

Good

Female protagonists drive the plot with significant agency and autonomy. Characters like DeeDee and Clementine subvert submissive femininity tropes through their chaotic and destructive behaviors.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast and central character arcs appear relatively homogeneous. The narrative focuses on a specific social circle that does not actively challenge Anglo-centric casting norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story prioritizes a secular, urban-centric worldview centered in New York City. It values social rebellion and individualist exploration over traditional religious or institutional values.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible evidence regarding the inclusion or portrayal of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Strengths

  • High degree of agency for female protagonists.
  • Subversion of submissive femininity tropes through complex characters.
  • Focus on female-centric perspectives and interpersonal dynamics.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of visible racial and ethnic diversity in the cast.
  • Absence of explicit LGBTQ+ narrative centering.
  • Limited intersectional representation within the central character arcs.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds in disrupting traditional gender hierarchies by centering the narrative on the complex, non-idealized lives of women. By granting female characters agency and autonomy, it moves away from patriarchal storytelling tropes. However, the film's impact is limited by a lack of visible racial diversity and explicit LGBTQ+ centering. The social circle remains relatively homogeneous, adhering to conventional demographic frameworks. Ultimately, the work functions as a character-driven comedy that challenges social decorum and traditional femininity while remaining within a narrow intersectional scope.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.