New Showbiz

You are here:
An Ordinary Man

An Ordinary Man

2017

R

Director

Brad Silberling

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A war criminal in hiding forms a relationship with his only connection to the outside world - his maid.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative storylines. The narrative focus remains strictly on legal and racial dimensions.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a male protagonist's agency and legal battle. It lacks significant female agency or the subversion of gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

Casting Laurence Fishburne allows for a deep exploration of how racial identity intersects with the American legal system. It critiques how racialized perception catalyzes media frenzies.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques Western institutions and the 'court of public opinion.' It portrays state authority and media as potentially corrupt or fallible entities.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no meaningful depiction of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities that drive the narrative or provide character agency.

Strengths

  • Strong racial representation through a prominent Black lead navigating systemic legal biases.
  • Sophisticated critique of Western judicial institutions and the fallibility of state authority.
  • Effective exploration of how media-driven public opinion impacts the administration of justice.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of meaningful female agency or subversion of traditional gendered power dynamics.
  • Complete absence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative storylines.
  • No significant depiction of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities.

AI Analysis

An Ordinary Man succeeds as a specialized critique of systemic bias and the judicial landscape. By centering a Black protagonist, the film effectively uses racial identity to challenge the presumption of innocence and expose how media-driven vigilantism influences justice. However, the film's narrow focus results in significant gaps elsewhere. The narrative architecture is heavily male-centric, offering little room for female agency or diverse gendered perspectives. It also entirely ignores LGBTQ+ and disability representation. Ultimately, the film is a potent study of racial and institutional critique, but its lack of breadth across other demographic categories limits its overall diversity impact.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Racial & Ethnic Representation in Drama
  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film
  • Religious & Cultural Representation in Drama

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Sand Castle

Sand Castle

2017

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.