Howard Lovecraft & the Undersea Kingdom
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Howard Lovecraft & the Frozen Kingdom
2016
PGDirector
Sean Patrick O'Reilly
Runtime
83 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After visiting his father in Arkham Sanitarium, young Howard Lovecraft accidentally uses the legendary Necronomicon to open a portal to a strange frozen world filled with horrifying creatures and a great adventure.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.0/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks discernible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses on a traditional hero’s journey without any evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The narrative provides moderate subversion by featuring a female companion who actively participates in the adventure. This disrupts the trope of the passive female sidekick, offering more agency than standard genre fare.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The 1920s setting and biographical focus result in a homogeneous cast. There is no evidence of color-blind casting or significant racial blending within the primary character arcs.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film follows a standard hero's journey that reinforces traditional notions of morality. It does not prioritize anti-Western themes or the deconstruction of Western institutions.
Disability Representation
While the Arkham Sanitarium setting implies a focus on mental health, the film lacks characters with disabilities possessing high levels of agency or meaningful, character-driven narratives.
Strengths
- The female companion provides a capable counterpart to the lead, offering more agency than typical passive sidekicks.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks meaningful representation of neurodivergence or characters with disabilities possessing high agency.
- The historical setting results in a homogeneous cast with little racial or ethnic diversity.
- The narrative lacks LGBTQ+ characters or themes that critique heteronormativity.
AI Analysis
The film functions primarily as a traditional genre piece. While it offers slight subversions of gendered adventure tropes by providing female agency, it remains largely tethered to historical norms and conventional narrative structures. It lacks the intersectional complexity or systemic critique required for a higher progressive rating. The narrative is heavily constrained by its 1920s period setting and biographical focus, which limits racial and ethnic variety. This results in a homogeneous cast that adheres to historical norms rather than utilizing diverse representation. Ultimately, the film prioritizes a classic struggle between a protagonist and supernatural entities. This focus on a standard hero's journey prevents the exploration of more nuanced or diverse social perspectives.
Similar Movies
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.