The film adheres to the conventional social frameworks of early 1990s teen comedies. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or narratives that challenge heteronormative structures.

The narrative centers on male protagonists and collegiate tropes. It lacks evidence of female agency or the subversion of traditional gender roles, relying instead on conventional 1990s dynamics.

The production reflects the demographic homogeneity common in early 90s American collegiate comedies. The narrative lacks intentional intersectional or multicultural breadth within its university setting.

The film functions as a postmodern pastiche, using Gothic horror for slapstick rebellion. It leans into established social structures rather than prioritizing systemic or anti-capitalist critiques.

The Frankenstein character is portrayed as 'dumb as a brick,' using cognitive difference as a comedic device. This risks using intellectual impairment as a plot mechanism rather than providing nuanced representation.