You are here:
Going! Going! Gosh!

Going! Going! Gosh!

1952

NR

Director

Chuck Jones

Runtime

7 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The Coyote makes various attempts to get the Road Runner with an explosive-tipped arrow, by shooting himself out of a sling shot and by covering the road with quick drying cement.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.3/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses entirely on a kinetic, predatory chase between two non-human entities. There is no evidence of queer identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative centers on two male-coded animal characters. It operates within a vacuum of gendered social structures, offering no exploration of feminine or masculine agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The characters are anthropomorphic animals in a desert setting. There is no evidence of diverse human experiences or semiotic layers representing different races or ethnicities.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film functions as a closed-loop narrative of instinct and failure. It lacks engagement with multiculturalism, religious institutions, or critiques of Western social structures.

Disability Representation

Limited

The Coyote’s frequent physical injuries serve as comedic slapstick devices. These moments are used for humor rather than as nuanced explorations of bodily vulnerability or neurodivergence.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated character psychology and comedic timing through Chuck Jones' direction.
  • Deconstructs the concept of a hero through the lens of a perpetually failing antagonist.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks narrative complexity to address intersectional identities or social hierarchies.
  • Provides no meaningful representation of gender, race, or diverse cultural backgrounds.

AI Analysis

This Chuck Jones short is a highly specialized piece of kinetic animation centered on the repetitive, cyclical nature of a comedic chase. The narrative architecture prioritizes character-driven slapstick and physical causality over any meaningful social commentary. Because the story exists within a vacuum of non-human characters and desert settings, it lacks the complexity required to address intersectional identities. The focus remains strictly on the laws of physics and the predator-prey dynamic.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.