You are here:
We Are Monsters

We Are Monsters

2015

Director

Tommy Wiklund, Sonny Laguna

Runtime

74 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Emma is kidnapped and imprisoned by a trio of psychopaths.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks any visible LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. It follows a traditional thriller structure that avoids queer narratives or visibility.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a female protagonist in a position of extreme vulnerability. It relies on a 'damsel in distress' framework, reinforcing conventional gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

There is no indication of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon cast. The film appears to follow standard, homogeneous casting patterns common in low-budget thrillers.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The narrative focuses on individual survival rather than socio-political commentary. It lacks any critique of Western institutions or significant cultural depth.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The plot focuses strictly on the trauma of kidnapping.

Strengths

  • The film provides a focused, singular narrative centered on a clear survival conflict.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film relies on outdated 'damsel in distress' tropes that limit female agency.
  • There is a lack of diverse casting and intersectional character identities.
  • The story misses opportunities to engage with broader socio-political or cultural themes.

AI Analysis

Animalistic operates as a conventional genre piece that relies heavily on established tropes. The narrative structure prioritizes survival and interpersonal conflict over any meaningful social or systemic commentary. The film fails to disrupt traditional hierarchies, instead leaning into predictable power imbalances. By centering the plot on a female victim and male aggressors, it reinforces standard gendered archetypes rather than subverting them. Ultimately, the production lacks the intentionality required for progressive representation. It functions as a standard low-budget thriller without intersectional depth or diverse character perspectives.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.