You are here:
Smash-Up on Interstate 5

Smash-Up on Interstate 5

1976

Director

John Llewellyn Moxey

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In this made-for-TV disaster movie, the lives of a group of motorists are chronicled retrospectively after they're involved in a 39-car pile-up on California's Interstate 5 over 4th of July weekend.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks discernible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Interpersonal dynamics center on traditional pairings, with no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Fair

Women provide the narrative's emotional weight, particularly through June Pearson's terminal illness. However, male characters like Sam Marcum hold the primary roles of leadership and investigative agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The ensemble appears to be a predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon cast. The California highway setting is not used to explore multi-cultural or intersectional themes.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story follows traditional Western structures, emphasizing individual responsibility. It reinforces respect for institutional order through its law enforcement protagonist.

Disability Representation

Fair

June Pearson offers a nuanced depiction of terminal illness, focusing on psychological and relational impacts. However, the portrayal leans into the trope of the tragic sufferer.

Strengths

  • Provides a nuanced, somber depiction of terminal illness through June Pearson.
  • Explores the psychological and relational impacts of chronic illness beyond simple tropes.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity within the ensemble cast.
  • Reinforces conventional gender hierarchies by centering male characters in roles of authority.
  • Fails to include LGBTQ+ narratives or non-cisnormative identities.
  • Relies on traditional Western narrative structures without systemic critique.

AI Analysis

The film is a product of its era, functioning as a character-driven disaster drama that prioritizes traditional storytelling over social disruption. It uses a mass-casualty event to highlight individual fragility rather than challenging systemic hierarchies. While the film provides meaningful engagement with the theme of chronic illness, it lacks the intersectional complexity required for a higher score. The narrative architecture relies on established social archetypes and conventional gender roles. Ultimately, the work focuses on personal tragedy and individual circumstances, offering little in the way of diverse representation or critique of Western institutions.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.