
WWE Money in the Bank 2014
2014

2013
PG-13Director
Kevin Dunn
Runtime
180 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After a faux retirement speech, a vicious attack revealed Mark Henry's true objective… becoming WWE Champion. Can John Cena overcome size and momentum to stay out of the Hall of Pain, or will The World's Strongest Man put a most elusive stamp on his near two-decade career? Plus, Dolph Ziggler seeks revenge and the World Heavyweight Championship when he challenges Alberto Del Rio. And in the first ever Money In The Bank All Stars Ladder Match, Rob Van Dam makes his much anticipated return to compete against 5 other former champions, all battling to scale the ladder and grab destiny. Who will rise to the top at WWE Money in the Bank?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The broadcast adheres to strict heteronormative structures. There is a notable absence of non-cisnormative identities or depictions of same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The event reflects traditional gender hierarchies. While women's matches are included, the focus remains on male-centric power dynamics and physical dominance.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production shows moderate inclusion through a multi-ethnic cast. Performers like Alberto Del Rio provide variety, though roles often rely on traditional character tropes.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative reinforces Western capitalist values through meritocratic competition. It celebrates the structured authority of the WWE organization rather than critiquing institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible representation of visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains entirely on able-bodied athletic performance.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
WWE Money in the Bank 2013 is a commercial sports-entertainment product that prioritizes established archetypes over social exploration. The narrative is built upon conventional hierarchies of masculinity and physical dominance. While the cast provides moderate ethnic variety, the production lacks the intentionality to disrupt social norms. It functions primarily to reinforce existing cultural and gendered power structures through a lens of individual achievement.

2014

2012

2009

2013

2012

2012

2013

2008

2004

2007

2010

2013
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.