You are here:

WWE TLC: Tables Ladders & Chairs 2017

Name: WWE TLC: Tables Ladders & Chairs 2017
Director: Kevin Dunn
Released: 2017
Duration: 178 min

Representation Score

4.4/10

Fair

2017

TV-PG

Director

Kevin Dunn

Runtime

178 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

WWE TLC 2017 operates primarily as a traditional athletic spectacle. While the roster achieves some success in racial diversity with a globalized cast, the production lacks intentionality in challenging gender hierarchies or exploring LGBTQ+ identities. The narrative focuses on conventional competitive clichés and a hero-versus-villain dichotomy. This approach celebrates organized, rule-based competition rather than challenging established cultural or moral institutions. Ultimately, the event centers on able-bodied performance and traditional gender roles, missing opportunities for more inclusive storytelling.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does WWE TLC: Tables Ladders & Chairs 2017 have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The event does not prominently depict non-binary genders or same-sex relationships. Instead, it follows traditional structures typical of mainstream sports entertainment.

How does WWE TLC: Tables Ladders & Chairs 2017 portray gender?

Fair

Women showcase high levels of physical competence and play significant roles in driving the story. However, the structure reinforces binary roles through separate championship divisions.

How racially and ethnically diverse is WWE TLC: Tables Ladders & Chairs 2017?

Good

The roster includes a diverse cast of performers from around the world, featuring characters like Asuka and Roman Reigns who have significant roles in the story.

How does WWE TLC: Tables Ladders & Chairs 2017 represent religion and culture?

Limited

The event upholds traditional Western structures of competition and meritocracy. It relies on a hero-versus-villain dichotomy without exploring moral relativism or systemic critiques.

Does WWE TLC: Tables Ladders & Chairs 2017 include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no visible or implied representation of disabilities. The focus remains on able-bodied athletic performance without using disability for narrative depth.

Present on Screen

The roster includes meaningful ethnic diversity with a globalized cast of performers.
Characters from various backgrounds play significant roles in the story.
Women are given significant roles and physical presence through dedicated segments.

Limited or Absent

The event lacks any depiction of LGBTQ+ identities or non-binary narratives.
The structure reinforces gender binaries through separate championship divisions.
There is no representation of visible or invisible disabilities in the featured matches.
The narrative relies on simple moral frameworks without exploring complex cultural critiques.

Official Synopsis

The Hounds of Justice reunited, as they face the likes of the Miz, Braun Strowman and the Bar in the main event. Meanwhile, the under card looks to deliver their own sense of justice to their opponents.

How are these scores produced? →