You are here:
The Making of 'Independence Day'

The Making of 'Independence Day'

1996

Director

Thomas C. Grane

Runtime

29 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

We take a look at various fields of development for the motion picture, Independence Day (1996). Jeff Goldblum is our guide through 'Area ID4' (a rip-off name of Area 51). He pretends to creep around and give us "secret" information about the film. There is also interviews with the cast and crew, and some other behind the scenes stuff that is only there to impress you, and to make you want to go see the film.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.6/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The content focuses on technical filmmaking and cast interviews. There are no LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives present to critique heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on high-octane action, which traditionally emphasizes masculine leadership. There is no evidence of women demonstrating intellect or strength relative to men.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

This featurette focuses on behind-the-scenes mechanics. There is no evidence of high-agency characters of color driving the documentary's specific narrative.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The work is tied to promoting a Western blockbuster. It functions as a tool of the film industry rather than a critique of Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of characters or crew members with visible or invisible disabilities being portrayed with agency or as central figures.

Strengths

  • Provides a meta-narrative through Jeff Goldblum's guide through 'Area ID4'.
  • Offers behind-the-scenes access to the cast and crew of a major blockbuster.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks intentional representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
  • Fails to showcase high-agency characters of color or diverse cultural perspectives.
  • Does not provide meaningful representation of individuals with disabilities.

AI Analysis

This documentary functions primarily as a promotional tool to build anticipation for the feature film. Its purpose is to showcase technical production and marketing rather than to architect social narratives or subvert cultural norms. The content adheres to mid-1990s industry standards, prioritizing spectacle and the mechanics of Hollywood production. Because the medium is designed for promotional utility, there is little opportunity for deep intersectional storytelling. Ultimately, the work lacks intentional representation or the deconstruction of social hierarchies, focusing instead on the star power of Jeff Goldblum and the technical scale of the production.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.