
On the Job
2013

2014
RDirector
Gareth Evans
Runtime
150 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After fighting his way through an apartment building populated by an army of dangerous criminals and escaping with his life, SWAT team member Rama goes undercover, joining a powerful Indonesian crime syndicate to protect his family and uncover corrupt members of his own force.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It focuses on traditional heteronormative family structures as the primary motivation for the protagonist.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a masculine hierarchy of combat and power. Female characters are relegated to secondary or domestic roles, serving as emotional stakes rather than active agents.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film provides a robust depiction of Indonesian identity. By centering a non-Western cast in Jakarta, it disrupts conventional Anglo-centric action tropes.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative offers a sophisticated critique of state power and institutional corruption. It portrays high-ranking officials as predatory and complicit in organized crime.
Disability Representation
There is no meaningful representation of disability. Physical trauma is used as a plot device for action rather than exploring lived experiences of disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Raid 2 succeeds in providing a culturally authentic experience by centering its narrative within the urban context of Jakarta. This non-Western focus provides a refreshing departure from standard Hollywood crime thrillers, offering a gritty, localized perspective on systemic decay. However, the film is heavily constrained by its adherence to hyper-masculine archetypes. The power dynamics are almost exclusively male-driven, leaving female characters with little agency beyond their roles as emotional anchors. This creates a narrow social landscape that lacks breadth. Ultimately, while the film excels at deconstructing institutional authority and providing ethnic authenticity, it fails to include diverse perspectives regarding gender, sexuality, or disability. The result is a visceral but socially traditional cinematic experience.

2013

2016

2009

2018

2007

2016

1995

1988

2009

2010

2016

2006
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.