
Hippocrates
2014

2018
PGDirector
Thomas Lilti
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Antoine is about to start his first year of medical school… for the third time. Benjamin, just out of high school, will make his first try. He soon realizes it's not exactly a walk in the park. In a fiercely competitive environment, with nights dedicated to hard studying rather than hard partying, the two freshmen will have to adapt and find a middle ground between despair for the present and hope for the future.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on academic and professional rigors rather than identity politics. There are no central LGBTQ+ character arcs or explicit explorations of non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Women are depicted with significant agency in high-stakes medical roles. The narrative emphasizes professional competence and intellectual parity, avoiding traditional tropes of submissive femininity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The student cohort reflects a multicultural French demographic. This avoids a homogeneous white depiction, offering a realistic view of modern European institutional spaces.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story prioritizes a secular, professionalist worldview over religious frameworks. It critiques the dehumanizing, machine-like nature of modern medical training and its systemic pressures.
Disability Representation
The narrative lacks prominent characters with visible or invisible disabilities. While it explores mental health struggles like exhaustion, these are treated as occupational hazards.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Freshmen offers a grounded, realistic portrayal of the medical profession by mirroring contemporary societal demographics. It succeeds in subverting gendered expectations, presenting women as intellectually equal peers in a competitive environment. The multicultural casting provides a pluralistic view of modern European institutions. However, the film lacks depth in intersectional representation. It misses opportunities to explore queer identities or central disability narratives, focusing instead on the psychological toll of professional training. The social landscape remains largely backgrounded in favor of academic realism. Ultimately, the film avoids monolithic storytelling by presenting a nuanced, multi-faceted professional class, even if it stays within a secular and traditionalist institutional framework.

2014

2023

2022

2004

2013

1984

2017

2019

2016

2017

2016

2020
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.