
Den of Lions
2003

1974
RDirector
Michael Carreras, Monte Hellman
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Shatter, an international contract killer, has been assigned to assassinate the President of a small African country and collect his fee from a bank in the Far East. On arrival in Hong Kong his life is threatened and when the bank denies all knowledge of payment arrangements, he realises he has been drawn into a dangerous game where there are no rules. Amongst the players are the Mafia and several foreign intelligence services and the stakes being played for are deadly.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on geopolitical espionage and contract killing. There is no mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative relationship dynamics.
Gender Representation
The narrative is centered on a male protagonist navigating a world of organized crime. Agency and plot drivers are positioned within a masculine-coded framework of violence.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting moves from an African nation to Hong Kong, necessitating a diverse cast. This multi-polar perspective disrupts a purely Western-centric viewpoint.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story engages with themes of systemic corruption and institutional betrayal. However, it largely functions within established crime thriller tropes.
Disability Representation
There is no information regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Shatter is a 1970s crime thriller that utilizes an international scope to move beyond a singular Western perspective. By shifting the action between Africa and Hong Kong, the film creates opportunities for racial and ethnic intersectionality through its global setting. However, the film remains heavily tethered to the period's genre archetypes. The narrative is driven by a male protagonist, placing the primary agency within a masculine-coded framework of professional assassination and violence. While the plot critiques institutional corruption, it lacks significant representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disability. The film reflects the social structures and character tropes typical of the era's action cinema.

2003

2001

1967

2008
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.