
ET Contact: They Are Here
2017

2022
Director
Caroline Cory
Runtime
88 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A Tear in the Sky takes you on an unprecedented journey into the UAP/UFO phenomenon as we follow a team of world-renowned experts, scientists, and military personnel who will attempt to unravel the UAP/UFO mysteries using state-of-the-art, military-grade equipment, and technology. While the UFO phenomenon has existed since the dawn of recorded history, very little scientific research is accessible to the public. Most of the serious research is conducted by various governments and militaries across the planet; this film is a documentary on how a team of military veterans, scientists, and researchers come together and launch an investigation into this fascinating world of the unknown while providing the data and results to the public.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or critiques of heteronormativity. The focus remains on technical investigation and scientific data rather than identity-driven storytelling.
Gender Representation
The documentary features a multidisciplinary team of experts and military personnel. While these fields often favor masculine hierarchies, the collaborative structure suggests a potential for diverse scientific voices.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film's global scope involving various international governments suggests potential for multi-ethnic representation. However, there is no explicit evidence of specific intersectional character arcs.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative challenges Western institutional transparency by pitting a private team against state secrecy. This focus on democratizing information disrupts conventional authority and systemic opacity.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters or experts defined by visible or invisible disabilities within the film's professional records or synopsis.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
A Tear in the Sky is a technical documentary that prioritizes investigative substance over identity politics. Its primary strength lies in its structural challenge to institutional gatekeeping and the democratization of specialized knowledge. By exposing government secrecy, the film subverts established systemic hierarchies. However, the film lacks explicit intersectional character development. The focus on scientific data and military expertise means that identity-driven narratives are largely absent, preventing a higher score in social representation categories. Ultimately, the film's value is found in its pursuit of transparency rather than its portrayal of diverse human experiences.

2017

2017

2020

2010

2004

2021
2019

2017

2015

2019

2022
1979
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.