You are here:

In the Fire

In the Fire

Representation Score

7.2/10

Good

2023

R

Director

Conor Allyn

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

In the Fire explores the friction between scientific rationalism and religious dogma through a period-set thriller. The film's primary strength lies in its subversion of 19th-century gender roles by centering a female doctor with significant intellectual authority. However, the narrative lacks depth in other areas. There is no visible LGBTQ+ representation, and the racial dynamics of the plantation setting are not explicitly detailed, leaving the film's approach to historical racial hierarchies unproven. Ultimately, the film functions as a study of epistemological conflict. While it challenges religious institutions, it remains limited by a lack of verified diversity across racial and sexual orientation categories.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does In the Fire have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any characters identifying as LGBTQ+. The narrative focuses solely on the tension between the female protagonist and the local religious establishment.

How does In the Fire portray gender?

Good

A female doctor serves as the central figure of intellectual leadership. Her role as a scientific practitioner in a patriarchal 1890s setting challenges traditional depictions of submissive femininity.

How racially and ethnically diverse is In the Fire?

Fair

The 1890s plantation setting implies complex racial hierarchies, yet the film lacks explicit confirmation of characters of color with significant roles. The racial composition of the ensemble remains unverified.

How does In the Fire represent religion and culture?

Good

The story prioritizes scientific inquiry over religious dogma. By framing the priest's views as reactionary, the film critiques established Western religious authority and traditional institutional structures.

Does In the Fire include disability representation?

Fair

The plot centers on a disturbed boy with inexplicable abilities, touching on themes of neurodivergence. It is unclear if this character possesses true ability to act or serves a horror cliché.

Present on Screen

  • The female protagonist provides a strong subversion of 19th-century gender hierarchies through her intellectual leadership.
  • The narrative offers a compelling critique of traditional religious authority and institutional dogma.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks visible LGBTQ+ representation or critiques of the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.
  • There is insufficient evidence regarding the ability to act and presence of characters of color within the historical setting.
  • The portrayal of the 'disturbed' child risks using neurodivergence as a mere plot device for horror.

Official Synopsis

A doctor from New York travels to a remote plantation in the 1890s to care for a disturbed boy who seems to have inexplicable abilities. She begins treating the child, but in doing so, ignites a war between science and religion as the local priest believes the boy is possessed by the devil and the cause of the village's woes.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.