You are here:
The Bad Guys 2

The Bad Guys 2

2025

PG

Director

Pierre Perifel

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The now-reformed Bad Guys are trying (very, very hard) to be good, but instead find themselves hijacked into a high-stakes, globe-trotting heist, masterminded by a new team of criminals they never saw coming: The Bad Girls.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.4/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

Queer actors voice key roles, yet the narrative centers exclusively on a heterosexual romance. The absence of same-sex intimacy or non-heteronormative arcs among protagonists limits narrative agency for LGBTQ+ identities.

Gender Representation

Good

Female antagonists drive the conflict with superior intellect, inverting traditional hierarchies. Male protagonists appear reactive and inept, while women hold strategic power, challenging conventional gender dynamics effectively.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

A racially diverse ensemble avoids stereotypical caricatures, defined instead by species and personality. This normalization of multi-ethnic voices in leading roles within a family comedy represents meaningful, well-developed inclusion.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques authority and frames reformation as a personal journey rather than a moral imperative. It remains a lighthearted comedy that avoids radical institutional deconstruction, aligning with moderate secular values.

Disability Representation

Fair

No characters with visible or invisible disabilities are prominently featured. The focus on species-based traits excludes human disability experiences, resulting in a neutral score due to the absence of specific representation.

Strengths

  • Female antagonists possess superior strategic intellect, inverting traditional gender hierarchies.
  • Racially diverse ensemble avoids stereotypes, defined by personality rather than caricature.
  • Normalization of multi-ethnic voices in leading roles within a mainstream family comedy.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of same-sex intimacy or non-heteronormative relationship structures among protagonists.
  • Absence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities limits inclusive representation.
  • No exploration of neurodivergence or chronic illness within the narrative framework.

AI Analysis

The film excels in racial and gender representation by normalizing a diverse cast and inverting traditional power dynamics. Female characters drive the plot with agency, while the ensemble avoids racial stereotyping through anthropomorphic storytelling. However, LGBTQ+ representation remains limited to casting without narrative integration. The central romance is strictly heterosexual, and no queer arcs are explored. Similarly, disability representation is entirely absent, focusing solely on animal traits rather than human experiences. Culturally, the film maintains a moderate stance, critiquing authority without radical subversion. The overall profile is competent and inclusive, balancing progressive gender and racial elements with a lack of deeper identity exploration in other categories.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.