You are here:

Crows

Crows

Representation Score

6.5/10

Good

1988

Director

Ayelet Menahemi

Runtime

45 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Crows offers a sophisticated look at the overlapping aspects of identity by centering characters living on the fringes of society. The film's strength lies in its disruption of assumptions about straight relationships and male dominance through its focus on queer domesticity and female autonomy. While the film excels in portraying identity-driven community building, it lacks specific details regarding racial or ethnic diversity. The narrative focus remains primarily on class and sexual orientation within an urban Israeli context. Ultimately, the film serves as a critique of traditional institutions, replacing them with a transient, communal lifestyle that prioritizes the lived experiences of those outside the mainstream.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Crows have LGBTQ+ representation?

Excellent

The film focuses on a queer commune, highlighting young men in the domestic narrative. This approach normalizes non-traditional living arrangements and goes beyond superficial cameos.

How does Crows portray gender?

Good

Maggie’s journey from a rural patriarchal household to urban Tel Aviv highlights her pursuit of independence. The film uses this migration to challenge traditional nuclear family hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Crows?

Fair

The narrative emphasizes socio-economic marginalization and class-based diversity among homeless teenagers. However, specific racial or ethnic compositions are not explicitly detailed.

How does Crows represent religion and culture?

Excellent

By centering on displaced youth, the film critiques traditional institutions like the nuclear family. It frames fringe communal living as a valid alternative to settled societal structures.

Does Crows include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no explicit evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The characters' vulnerability is framed through socio-economic homelessness rather than disability.

Present on Screen

  • Strong centering of queer identities through a communal living arrangement.
  • Effective subversion of traditional gender roles via the female protagonist's quest for autonomy.
  • Nuanced exploration of social deconstruction and anti-institutional sentiment.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of explicit detail regarding racial and ethnic diversity within the urban setting.
  • No visible representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

The life of some homeless teenagers in Tel-Aviv, many of them homosexuals. Seventeen-year-old Maggie decides to leave her father and rural life behind and make her way to Tel Aviv. She ends up in a commune, living with Yuval, Ellie, and Daniel – three young queer men from the furthest fringes of Tel Aviv’s nightlife scene. The tensions between the three may be palpable but that does not stop the flatshare from being a home to all its residents – whether permanent or transient.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.