You are here:
tEXt

tEXt

2017

Director

Nick Johnson, Tye Gibson

Runtime

9 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A modern day take on silent films blended with horror.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. Its focus on silent film aesthetics suggests a stylistic experiment rather than a platform for queer visibility.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female leads Kelsey Samara Dacci and Emily Hutchison headline the cast. However, it remains unclear if the narrative grants these women high agency or relies on traditional genre tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Information regarding the racial composition of the cast or character backgrounds is unavailable. There is no indication of race-bent casting or diverse ethnic representation.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film functions as a modern thriller/horror hybrid. It does not appear to engage in systemic critiques of religion, family, or traditional institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Neurodivergent representation is also absent from the narrative.

Strengths

  • The film features female leads in the top-billed cast.
  • The project explores unique stylistic experimentation through silent film aesthetics.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or queer visibility.
  • There is no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • The film does not address disability or neurodivergent identities.
  • The story lacks engagement with systemic cultural or religious critiques.

AI Analysis

tEXt prioritizes stylistic genre experimentation over social or intersectional commentary. By blending silent film aesthetics with modern horror, the film focuses on technical novelty rather than deconstructing social hierarchies. The production lacks a documented history of intentional narrative subversion. Consequently, the film maintains a traditional genre profile that offers little insight into diverse identities or systemic critiques. Without specific data on character arcs or ethnic backgrounds, the film remains a niche stylistic exercise rather than a vehicle for inclusive storytelling.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.