You are here:
Zero III

Zero III

2017

Director

Emilis Vėlyvis

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

An outrageous crime - action - comedy examining corruption and greed in Lithuanian politics.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives. The story prioritizes political crime and comedy over identity-based exploration.

Gender Representation

Fair

Prominent female performers like Inga Jankauskaitė and Rimantė Valiukaitė are part of the ensemble. However, it remains unclear if these roles provide significant agency or follow traditional genre tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The production reflects the demographic reality of Lithuania, focusing on domestic politics. The cast and setting suggest a homogeneous ethnic composition consistent with the regional context.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film engages deeply with institutional critique by examining corruption and greed in Lithuanian politics. It prioritizes deconstructing power structures over promoting traditional civic virtues.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no verifiable evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • Strong thematic engagement with institutional critique and the deconstruction of political power.
  • Effective use of genre-blending to examine systemic corruption and greed.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of documented intersectional breadth regarding LGBTQ+ and racial representation.
  • Limited evidence of diverse character agency or the subversion of gender hierarchies.

AI Analysis

Zero III functions primarily as a socio-political satire, using the crime-comedy genre to dissect systemic corruption and greed within Lithuanian institutions. Its narrative strength lies in its critique of authority and the deconstruction of political power structures. However, the film lacks intersectional breadth. The focus on localized political dysfunction results in a relatively homogeneous cast and a narrative that does not actively engage with diverse identities or non-heteronormative perspectives. While the film succeeds in its thematic commitment to questioning established power, it misses opportunities to integrate broader representation across gender, race, and sexual orientation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.