
So Far So Good
2015

2005
Director
Ricardo Trogi
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The passage of time is probably the only concrete proof we have that justice exists in this cruel world. Some people would like to stop time in its tracks, while others choose to follow its path. In this story, three men in their early thirties have reached that age when it's time to start thinking about "getting a life", perhaps starting a family. But how do you handle the fact that your friendships are changing? That, slowly, your new family is becoming the center of your ever-shrinking world? What do you do when you realize your youth is a thing of the past?
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on heteronormative pressures during mid-life transitions. It lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or a critique of heteronormativity, remaining centered on traditional social expectations.
Gender Representation
The story centers on male protagonists, which risks a patriarchal perspective. However, it subverts this by portraying men through themes of vulnerability, inadequacy, and a loss of agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film reflects a relatively homogeneous social environment. There is no evidence of significant racial blending or diverse casting to disrupt the demographic norms of the setting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative deconstructs traditional milestones, framing family formation as a potential loss of self. It prioritizes individual existentialism over the promotion of traditional Western institutional stability.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence that disability or neurodivergence serves as a central narrative component or character arc in this film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Dodging the Clock is a sociological study of the transition into adulthood. It uses comedy to examine the friction between personal desire and the societal expectation to settle down. The film succeeds in providing a nuanced look at the existential tension inherent in reaching one's thirties. However, the film lacks demographic breadth. The focus on a homogeneous social group and the absence of diverse casting or LGBTQ+ narratives limit its intersectional reach. While it challenges the 'success' of traditional life paths, it does so within a narrow social framework. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its psychological depth rather than its demographic variety. It offers a cynical, character-driven view of social integration and the loss of individual autonomy.

2015

2013

2013

2016

2023

2021

2005

2020

2019

2001

2008

2023
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.