You are here:

Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam

Name: Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam
Released: 2017
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

1.2/10

Minimal

2017

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

As a live professional sporting event, this broadcast lacks the scripted character arcs and thematic intentionality found in cinema. It functions primarily as a celebration of athletic merit and commercial spectacle. The high racial diversity score stems from the central figures, Joshua and Takam, representing a globalized heavyweight landscape. This provides meaningful representation within the sporting sphere. However, the absence of gender diversity, LGBTQ+ narratives, or disability representation results in a low overall score. The event reinforces traditional sporting hierarchies rather than offering progressive social commentary.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The broadcast focuses exclusively on the athletic competition. There is no presence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives within the sporting context.

How does Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam portray gender?

Minimal

This is a male-only athletic contest. The broadcast adheres to traditional sporting hierarchies and lacks any subversion of gender roles or dynamics.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam?

Good

The matchup between Anthony Joshua and Carlos Takam highlights a globalized athletic landscape through diverse participants of Nigerian and Cameroonian descent.

How does Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam represent religion and culture?

Minimal

The event operates within traditional Western sporting institutions and capitalism. It reinforces the structures of professional sports rather than engaging with alternative cultural themes.

Does Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam include disability representation?

Minimal

The broadcast focuses on peak physical conditioning and athletic ability. There is no representation of neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or chronic illness.

Present on Screen

The central matchup features significant racial diversity through athletes of Nigerian and Cameroonian descent.
The event highlights a globalized athletic landscape, moving away from historically Eurocentric heavyweight boxing dominance.

Limited or Absent

The broadcast lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
There is no exploration of gender dynamics or subversion of traditional gender roles.
The narrative provides no representation of neurodivergence or physical disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Following Vladimir Klitchsko's retirement after Joshua's last fight and mandatory challenger Kubret Pulev pulling out of the fight with a late injury, Carlos Takam was given just 12 days notice to fight the current WBA, IBF and IBO Heavyweight Champion. Widely regarded on the boxing scene as having one of the toughest granite chins in the business Takam took a considerable height and weight disadvantage into the ring, Anthony Joshua subsequently weighed in for what was then a career high 18st 2lbs and brought massive reach advantage. Before either fighter got into their rhythm this late match up resulted in blood spilled from both sides as old vs new battled in front of 75,000 fans in Cardiff, Wales. This became a world record high attendance for an indoor boxing event.

How are these scores produced? →