You are here:
VICE Special Report: A House Divided

VICE Special Report: A House Divided

2016

TV-MA

Director

Shane Smith

Runtime

70 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

President Obama speaks to 'VICE' about the post-election political climate and the fierce partisan fighting that dominated his Presidency.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.3/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film treats queer identity as a sociological marker within the American political fracture. It frames rights as a central point of contention in the cultural divide rather than focusing on character-driven narratives.

Gender Representation

Fair

Gender dynamics are observed through a sociological lens rather than a character-centric one. The documentary documents the friction caused by shifting social norms and traditionalist versus progressive societal structures.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The documentary excels by using a multi-ethnic cast of interviewees to illustrate electorate fragmentation. It captures diverse voices across various geographic landscapes to avoid a monolithic view of American identity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The report explores the breakdown of established democratic norms and the erosion of shared reality. It examines how organized religion and patriotism are being deconstructed or contested in the current climate.

Disability Representation

Fair

Disability is not a central thematic pillar of this documentary. Representation remains incidental to the broader political discourse, with no significant focus on neurodivergence or physical disability.

Strengths

  • Provides a nuanced, multi-ethnic view of the American electorate by moving beyond urban centers.
  • Offers a deep critique of the erosion of traditional Western institutions and democratic norms.
  • Avoids reductive stereotypes by focusing on the complex intersection of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks intentional focus or significant narrative drivers regarding neurodivergence or physical disability.
  • Treats LGBTQ+ and gender identities as sociological markers rather than through personal, character-driven narratives.
  • Does not explicitly center on the subversion of gender hierarchies or specific non-cisnormative identities.

AI Analysis

This documentary serves as a sophisticated study of societal fragmentation, utilizing a postmodern lens to examine identity politics and the erosion of institutional stability. It succeeds most prominently in its cultural and racial analysis, providing a nuanced view of the American electorate through a diverse, multi-ethnic cast. However, the film lacks depth in individual representation for specific demographics. While it addresses the sociological impact of gender and LGBTQ+ identities, it does so through a broad political lens rather than through personal, character-driven stories. Ultimately, the work is a systemic critique of the modern social contract. It prioritizes the study of how various identities intersect with political allegiance and the breakdown of traditional Western institutions.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.