You are here:
3 Times a Charm

3 Times a Charm

2011

TV-PG

Director

Letia Clouston

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Emma, the studious editor of the school paper, is tempted by the most popular boy in school, Chris Duval, to cheat. She is given a magical necklace that will give her 3 chances.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.5/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on traditional romantic tension between Emma and Chris Duval. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Fair

Emma is a studious female protagonist with intellectual agency. However, the plot relies on traditional romantic tropes and social hierarchies common in teen comedies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative lacks mention of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast. There is no indication of race-bending or diverse casting within the high school setting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story centers on individualistic gain through a magical artifact. It functions as a traditional morality tale rather than a critique of systemic or religious institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no depiction of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The film does not address neurodivergence or chronic illness.

Strengths

  • The film provides a female protagonist with intellectual agency through her role as a studious editor.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities, diverse racial backgrounds, and characters with disabilities.
  • The plot relies heavily on traditional romantic tropes and social hierarchies rather than subverting them.
  • The story focuses on individualistic gain rather than exploring or critiquing systemic institutions.

AI Analysis

3 Times a Charm follows a conventional high school comedy structure. The narrative centers on individual character choices and traditional social dynamics, offering little in the way of intersectional complexity or systemic critique. The film lacks representation across most major categories, including LGBTQ+ identities, racial diversity, and disability. While it features a female lead, the plot remains tethered to standard teen genre tropes. Ultimately, the story functions as a simple morality tale about academic dishonesty and magic, failing to disrupt established social hierarchies or provide a diverse cast.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.