Inhibitions
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Homejack Reverse
2017
Director
Yasushi Koshizaka
Runtime
70 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The roles are reversed in this sequel to the 2016 film, with two women "raping" a man during a home invasion.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
5.8/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on subverting sexual agency rather than exploring queer identity. There is no clear evidence of specific LGBTQ+ orientations within the narrative.
Gender Representation
The story actively disrupts conventional hierarchies by positioning women as aggressors and men as victims. This inversion challenges traditional tropes of masculine dominance and female submissiveness.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
No information is available regarding the racial or ethnic composition of the cast or the setting. Consequently, the diversity of this category cannot be assessed.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The premise uses role reversal to complicate traditional understandings of victimhood and aggression. This reframing suggests a move toward moral relativism within the narrative.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence to suggest the inclusion or depiction of characters with visible or invisible disabilities in this work.
Strengths
- Effectively challenges traditional gender hierarchies and tropes of dominance.
- Uses role reversal to disrupt conventional moral expectations of victimhood.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks verifiable representation of racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities.
- Provides no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
AI Analysis
Homejack Reverse distinguishes itself through a provocative inversion of gendered power dynamics. By casting women in the role of aggressors during a home invasion, the film deconstructs established expectations of strength and vulnerability. However, the narrative's focus remains narrow. While it successfully challenges masculine dominance, it lacks depth regarding queer identity or broader social critiques. The absence of data on racial and ethnic representation also limits its overall impact. Ultimately, the film is a study in role reversal that prioritizes the subversion of sexual agency over a multifaceted exploration of diverse identities.
Similar Movies
Frigid Fantasies
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
The Story of O Part 2
1984
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.2 out of 10
The Story of O
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Raigyo
1997
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
Submission
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
Tokyo Train Girls 2: Supervixen
2008
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Hell in a Bottle
1986
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
Beauty Rope Cosmetology
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
The Insatiable
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10
Woman of the Lake
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.3 out of 10
Skin of Roses
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.