
Carbon: A Story of Tomorrow
2017

2025
TV-MADirector
Kim Byung-woo
Runtime
107 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
When a raging flood traps a researcher and her young son, a call to a crucial mission puts their escape — and the future of humanity — on the line.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative remains strictly heteronormative, focusing solely on the maternal bond and past marriage. Non-heteronormative identities are entirely absent, offering no progressive expansion of identity categories within the disaster framework.
Gender Representation
An-na subverts traditional tropes as an intellectual authority driving survival, contrasting with distant male bureaucrats. Her competence and resilience empower female agency, while male roles are depicted as either complicit in secrecy or absent.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The predominantly Korean cast challenges Hollywood’s white-centric disaster norms. By centering the Korean experience of global catastrophe, the film offers a rare non-Anglo perspective without relying on racial stereotypes.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques Western institutional trust, framing global governance as corrupt and secretive. It promotes a secular, philosophical approach to survival, emphasizing human ingenuity and ethical responsibility over religious salvation.
Disability Representation
The narrative focuses exclusively on able-bodied survival in a high-stakes environment. The complete absence of visible or invisible disabilities results in a neutral-to-low score due to a lack of inclusive narrative architecture.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Great Flood leverages its South Korean setting to disrupt the typical white, male-dominated disaster movie archetype. An-na’s role as an AI researcher and mother anchors the film in female intellectual authority, directly challenging the passive victim trope common in the genre. This strong gender representation is bolstered by a diverse cast that centers non-Western perspectives, offering a fresh cultural lens on global catastrophe. However, the film’s diversity profile is uneven. While it excels in racial and gender representation, it completely ignores LGBTQ+ identities and disability. The narrative architecture does not accommodate these perspectives, resulting in low scores for those categories. The critique of institutional secrecy adds cultural depth, but the lack of intersectional inclusivity prevents the film from achieving a higher overall diversity rating.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.