You are here:

A Zed & Two Noughts

Name: A Zed & Two Noughts
Director: Peter Greenaway
Released: 1985
Duration: 116 min

Representation Score

7.0/10

Good

1985

Director

Peter Greenaway

Runtime

116 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Peter Greenaway’s work serves as a postmodern critique of Western intellectualism, emphasizing aesthetic rigor over traditional humanism. Though it lacks significant racial or LGBTQ+ representation, it disrupts conventional social hierarchies. The film’s strength lies in its rejection of standard moral and gender norms. By focusing on decay and symmetry, it provides a unique perspective on the human condition. Ultimately, the film is a highly stylized exploration of systemic patterns. It prioritizes a narrow, intellectualized deconstruction of cultural and biological norms over broad demographic representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Zed & Two Noughts have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film doesn't explore queer romantic relationships or non-straight identities. It focuses more on scientific and biological themes than on human sexuality or identity.

How does A Zed & Two Noughts portray gender?

Good

Gender roles are portrayed through abstract concepts rather than traditional family roles. Female characters are defined by their connection to science and decay, rather than traditional feminine roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Zed & Two Noughts?

Limited

The film's setting is primarily white and Eurocentric. It does not actively address racial diversity or use casting to challenge historical homogeneity.

How does A Zed & Two Noughts represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively critiques Western institutions and moral norms. It views human life and traditional sanctity as secondary to mathematical and aesthetic ideals.

Does A Zed & Two Noughts include disability representation?

Good

An amputee character is part of the film's exploration of biological decay. The portrayal avoids the pitiful portrayal of disability, treating it as a natural part of life.

Present on Screen

Challenges traditional Western institutions and moral norms.
Rebuts traditional gender hierarchies through intellectualized character roles.
Treats disability as a meaningful element of biological study rather than a stereotype.

Limited or Absent

Lacks racial and ethnic diversity in its predominantly white setting.
Does not include LGBTQ+ ability to act or non-straight romantic narratives.
Does not engage with a wide range of human identities.

Official Synopsis

Identical twin zoologists lose their wives in a car crash caused by a white swan. They become obsessed with the death and decay of animals, and develop a strange and unusual relationship with the driver of the car, a woman who is now an amputee.

How are these scores produced? →