You are here:
24×36

24×36

2016

Director

Kevin Burke

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A documentary exploring the birth, death and resurrection of illustrated movie poster art. Through interviews with a number of key art personalities from the 70s and 80s, as well as many modern, alternative poster artists, “Twenty-Four by Thirty-Six” aims to answer the question: What happened to the illustrated movie poster? Where did it disappear to, and why? In the mid 2000s, filling the void left behind by Hollywood’s abandonment of illustrated movie posters, independent artists and galleries began selling limited edition, screenprinted posters — a movement that has quickly exploded into a booming industry with prints selling out online in seconds, inspiring Hollywood studios to take notice of illustration in movie posters once more.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.2/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film focuses on the evolution of graphic design and poster art. There is little evidence of explicit non-heteronormative narratives or specific LGBTQ+ character arcs.

Gender Representation

Fair

Contributors within the illustration industry are presented with a balanced view. The film maintains a neutral, professional tone without actively seeking to subvert traditional gender roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast reflects the professional landscape of the art world through a globalized lens. However, the narrative does not center on specific racial struggles or systemic critiques.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary highlights a shift from corporate Hollywood dominance to decentralized art movements. It celebrates individual creative autonomy over centralized capitalist structures.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film contains no mention of disability representation. The narrative remains strictly focused on the history and resurrection of illustrated movie poster art.

Strengths

  • Disrupts the Hollywood monopoly by celebrating decentralized, independent art movements.
  • Provides a platform for non-traditional creators to reclaim agency in the illustration medium.
  • Offers a balanced view of professional contributors within the graphic design industry.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks intersectional depth regarding racial and ethnic identities.
  • Does not center explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or character arcs.
  • Fails to engage with systemic social critiques or identity politics.

AI Analysis

24×36 serves as a specialized study of a niche creative ecosystem. It finds its progressive value in disrupting the traditional Hollywood monopoly by favoring independent models of cultural expression. While the film elevates alternative voices and provides a platform for non-traditional creators, it lacks deep intersectional focus. The narrative prioritizes the medium of illustration over identity politics or systemic social critiques. Ultimately, the documentary succeeds as an artistic history but remains a professional survey rather than a social commentary.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.