You are here:

I Want More

Name: I Want More
Director: Jack Beap
Released: 1969
Duration: 70 min

Representation Score

4.0/10

Fair

1969

Director

Jack Beap

Runtime

70 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Jack Beap's documentary offers a transgressive look at the hedonistic underbelly of Los Angeles. It challenges the era's rigid social and moral norms by documenting non-conformist lifestyles and 'deviant' behaviors. However, the film relies heavily on the spectacle of deviance and lacks the depth and character-driven narratives needed to move beyond mere voyeurism. While it disrupts cultural norms, it fails to empower the underrepresented identities it depicts, often treating them as objects of curiosity rather than people.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does I Want More have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film examines non-traditional sexualities through its focus on 'deviant activities' and exclusive clubs. However, these subjects are often presented through voyeurism rather than through meaningful character development.

How does I Want More portray gender?

Fair

Women are portrayed primarily as passive subjects for leering voyeurs or as aesthetic tools for an artist. This reinforces traditional gender power imbalances rather than subverting them.

How racially and ethnically diverse is I Want More?

Limited

The documentary focuses on specific Los Angeles subcultures like bikers and wealthy socialites. There is no evidence of non-white representation within these social subsets.

How does I Want More represent religion and culture?

Good

The film actively challenges the conservative moral frameworks of 1969 by centering on hedonism and sin. It documents behaviors that defy traditional social norms, embracing moral relativism.

Does I Want More include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of individuals with physical or neurodivergent disabilities being included in the film's subject matter.

Present on Screen

Challenges the conservative moral frameworks and social decorum of the late 1960s.
Provides a non-conformist look at subcultures outside of traditional studio oversight.

Limited or Absent

Lacks nuanced character development, often reducing subjects to spectacles of deviance.
Reinforces gender imbalances through the objectification of female subjects.
Provides little evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within its social focus.

Official Synopsis

This lurid documentary offers a revealing expose of various deviant activities being practiced in that seething hotbed of sin and hedonism known as Los Angeles. Among the subjects shown herein are a young couple who are paid to have sex in front of leering voyeurs, a gang of rowdy bikers, a French artist who makes fancy designs out of women's pubic hair, a wild swinging Hollywood party, and an exclusive club of wealthy perverts.

How are these scores produced? →