
Fantasm
1976

1977
NRDirector
Colin Eggleston
Runtime
99 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Libbie is assigned to her paper's sexual advice column, "Dear Collete". She is taking over the job of Harry a crusty old journalist who shows her the pro's and cons of the job while running on a tight deadline to get the column finished for the morning's paper. During the course of the evening they reply to a wide variety of sexual experiences submitted by the readers, some these include, sex in a threesome at a drive-in theatre, sex in a gymnasium, and sex in a library where the "Silence Please" sign gives the male librarian an advantage over the female readers.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film explores non-traditional sexual dynamics through various vignettes, such as threesomes. However, it lacks explicit confirmation of queer identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
Gender Representation
Libbie holds professional agency as a columnist, yet the film relies on traditional power imbalances. One vignette depicts a male librarian using his position to gain an advantage over women.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative provides no evidence of racial blending or a non-white cast. There is no mention of diverse ethnic backgrounds within the story.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
By centering on a sexual advice column, the film prioritizes secular human impulse over institutionalized religious morality. It lacks a deeper systemic or anti-capitalist critique.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with physical or invisible disabilities. The film does not address neurodivergence or impairment.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Fantasm Comes Again functions as a genre-specific comedy that explores sexual liberation within a conventional social framework. It challenges mid-century taboos by centering on sexual discourse and situational ethics rather than rigid religious morality. However, the film fails to provide intersectional complexity. While it moves away from strict heteronormative constraints through its subject matter, it lacks diverse casting and systemic narrative deconstruction. The representation remains tied to traditional power dynamics and lacks meaningful engagement with racial or disability-related identities.

1976

1972

1976

1970

1968

1972
1982

1972
1970

1972

1976

1969
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.