You are here:

Anunnaki

Name: Anunnaki
Director: Philip Gardiner
Released: 2018
Duration: 66 min

Representation Score

1.5/10

Minimal

2018

Not Rated

Director

Philip Gardiner

Runtime

66 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Anunnaki functions as a work of speculative revisionism rather than social advocacy. Its primary disruption is theological, challenging established religious hegemony by replacing traditional divinity with extraterrestrial interventionism. However, the film lacks a meaningful focus on contemporary identity politics. The narrative architecture is built around ancient astronaut theory and pseudo-archaeology, which does not naturally intersect with modern social justice frameworks. Ultimately, the documentary fails to address gender, race, or LGBTQ+ identities. It prioritizes the deconstruction of myth and religious authority over the representation of diverse human experiences.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Anunnaki have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any characters or narratives related to LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities. The focus is solely on prehistoric origins and mythological deconstruction.

How does Anunnaki portray gender?

Limited

The narrative centers on ancestral figures and giants, which often aligns with patriarchal archetypes. There is no evidence of women's ability to drive the story or subversion of traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Anunnaki?

Limited

While the film explores the universal origins of humanity, it relies heavily on ancient Mesopotamian imagery. It does not commit to multi-layered racial representation or diverse casting.

How does Anunnaki represent religion and culture?

Fair

The documentary earns points by deconstructing Western religious institutions and the biblical God. It promotes a form of secular revisionism by framing theology through extraterrestrial engineering.

Does Anunnaki include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no indication of the inclusion of neurodivergent characters or individuals with physical disabilities within this documentary's scope.

Present on Screen

Challenges traditional Western religious hegemony and established theological frameworks.
Provides a non-traditional narrative structure by framing religious myths through a scientific/speculative lens.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth narratives.
Fails to include characters or perspectives addressing disability or neurodivergence.
Does not demonstrate a commitment to multi-layered racial representation or diverse casting.
Lacks evidence of women's ability to drive the story or the subversion of patriarchal archetypes.

Official Synopsis

450,000 years ago our ancestors descended from the heavens to engineer the first human beings. To us they were Giants that ruled as Gods over mankind. Now new evidence and scientific research acknowledges their existence on earth but reveals when they will return. The truth of their real origin and purpose is much more bizarre and amazing than anything previously believed. From the Garden of Eden to the Great Flood; from the God of the Bible to the secrets of Enoch all shall be revealed.

How are these scores produced? →