New Showbiz

You are here:
How to Be Single

How to Be Single

2016

R

Director

Christian Ditter

Runtime

110 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

New York City is full of lonely hearts seeking the right match, and what Alice, Robin, Lucy, Meg, Tom and David all have in common is the need to learn how to be single in a world filled with ever-evolving definitions of love.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film remains tethered to heteronormative dating structures. It lacks prominent LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that actively critique heteronormativity through a queer lens.

Gender Representation

Good

The narrative excels by centering female agency and personal identity. It disrupts traditional tropes by repositioning the female experience as the primary driver of the plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The ensemble is predominantly white, reflecting a lack of intersectional breadth. The story operates within a relatively homogeneous demographic framework in New York City.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film deconstructs traditional Western institutions like marriage. It frames singleness as an empowering state, prioritizing secular, individualistic pursuits over religious milestones.

Disability Representation

Fair

There is no significant focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by social and romantic statuses rather than neurodivergence or physical health.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by prioritizing female agency.
  • Challenges the conventional 'happily ever after' trope through personal autonomy.
  • Promotes singleness as a valid and empowering social state.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks significant racial and ethnic diversity within the ensemble.
  • Fails to include prominent LGBTQ+ characters or queer narratives.
  • Provides minimal representation for individuals with disabilities.

AI Analysis

How to Be Single serves as a transitional text that subverts the romantic comedy genre. It finds its strength in challenging the necessity of traditional domestic structures and centering female autonomy over romantic dependence. However, the film's impact is limited by a lack of intersectional breadth. The demographic scope remains relatively traditional, missing opportunities to include diverse racial and LGBTQ+ perspectives. Ultimately, while the film fails to provide significant racial or queer representation, it offers progressive value by redefining the 'happily ever after' through a lens of individualistic empowerment.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Gender Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Bridesmaids

Bridesmaids

2011

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.