
Ultras
2020

1991
Director
Ricky Tognazzi
Runtime
95 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The "Brigatte Veneno" is a fan group from the soccer club "AS Roma". The next match is against "Juventus Turin", the classic prestige duel. Principe, the former leader of the group, has been dismissed from jail a few days before. He has to realize that his best friend Red has not only taken over control of the group, but also has started an affair with his girlfriend. The rivalry between the hot-blooded Principe and the sensible Red causes an anxious mood within the group. When Smilzo, a member of the group, dies during a street fight with another fan group, Red knows that Principe is to be blamed for this catastrophe.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. There is no visible presence of LGBTQ+ characters or explorations of queer dynamics within the hyper-masculine environment.
Gender Representation
Female characters are relegated to the periphery, serving primarily as catalysts for male conflict. The narrative centers entirely on male-driven violence and traditional masculine hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast reflects a predominantly homogeneous working-class demographic. While capturing a specific regional identity, the film lacks intentional intersectional or multi-ethnic diversity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a complex cultural critique by portraying anti-social behavior as a byproduct of systemic neglect. It challenges the legitimacy of state-sanctioned legal and moral standards.
Disability Representation
There is no significant focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined almost exclusively by their physical capacity for violence and tribal participation.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Ultrà is a gritty character study of tribalism and the breakdown of social cohesion. It succeeds in providing a sophisticated cultural critique by framing the protagonists' actions through the lens of socioeconomic disenfranchisement. This perspective disrupts standard law-and-order narratives by questioning the legitimacy of state authority. However, the film is deeply limited by its narrow demographic focus. The heavy reliance on rigid, traditional masculine hierarchies and the marginalization of female characters significantly restrict its social breadth. The environment is hyper-masculine and insular, leaving little room for diverse identities. Ultimately, while the film achieves progressive complexity in its social commentary, its lack of intersectional representation prevents a higher diversity score.

2020

2009

1993

2001

1972

2005

1952

2005

2005

2000

2022

2010
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.