New Showbiz

You are here:
This Divided State

This Divided State

2005

Director

Steven Greenstreet

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This Divided State follows the controversy surrounding Utah Valley State College's invitation to liberal filmmaker Michael Moore to speak on campus. Though UVSC is located in one of the most conservative counties in the United States, vehement opposition to Moore's visit was much greater than anticipated. Equally surprising, however, was the overwhelming support for Moore, vocalized by students and community members previously considered "apathetic." Debate between Moore supporters and Moore protestors raged openly in the media and public forums. Death threats, hate mail, bribes, and lawsuits were all candidly captured on film.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.4/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film focuses on political and ideological friction rather than specific queer narratives. Representation appears incidental to the broader debate between liberal and conservative viewpoints.

Gender Representation

Fair

The documentary captures a spectrum of community voices during the public debate. There is no evidence of reinforced gender hierarchies or a specific emphasis on subverting gender roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The conflict centers on ideological tension within a specific regional demographic. The narrative does not prioritize racial or ethnic intersectionality as a primary driver of the story.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film effectively critiques monolithic religious and conservative social structures. It documents the intense friction between institutional authority and anti-establishment viewpoints.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information regarding the portrayal of individuals with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Strengths

  • Effectively critiques traditional religious and conservative social structures.
  • Highlights the complexity of ideological pluralism within a seemingly homogeneous region.
  • Documents the breakdown of institutional authority through real-world conflict.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation or narratives concerning LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Does not address racial or ethnic intersectionality within the regional conflict.
  • Provides no visible focus on disability representation or inclusion.

AI Analysis

This documentary functions as a study of ideological pluralism rather than a character-driven exploration of identity. It succeeds in deconstructing regional social homogeneity by documenting the volatile clash between institutional authority and individualist perspectives. However, the film lacks explicit intersectional development. While it challenges cultural hegemony, it does not provide specific representation for LGBTQ+, racial, or disabled communities, focusing instead on the political friction surrounding Michael Moore's visit.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.