You are here:
Bordering on Bad Behavior

Bordering on Bad Behavior

2014

Not Rated

Director

Jac Mulder

Runtime

85 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Baz, a Lebanese Australian soldier, accidentally enters a top secret Israeli communications base. Knowing he is in the wrong place at the wrong time, Baz surprises Bob, an American soldier, with a punch in the face and Ari, an Israeli soldier, with a chokehold. Once the two enemies are tied up, Baz tries to leave, but the door to the base, which has closed behind him, has a time mechanism that will keep it locked for the next six hours. Trapped and convinced that once the door is reopened they could all be executed, the three are forced to confront each other. This will allow them to overcome personal prejudices and give life to a friendship with dramatic but also hilarious consequences.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks explicit mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. It focuses on cross-cultural friction rather than queer-coded narratives.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a male-dominated military environment. It does not depict female characters or the subversion of gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film features a multi-ethnic cast, centering a Lebanese Australian protagonist alongside American and Israeli soldiers. This disrupts the typical homogeneity of military action cinema.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative deconstructs enemy archetypes by forcing characters to overcome personal prejudices. It critiques geopolitical tensions through a situational ethics framework.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • Strong ethnic diversity through the casting of a Lebanese Australian protagonist.
  • Effective disruption of traditional wartime 'us vs. them' narratives.
  • Nuanced exploration of cultural friction and personal prejudice.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of female representation within the military setting.
  • Absence of LGBTQ+ characters or queer-coded themes.
  • No inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds as a study of ethnic and geopolitical intersectionality. By trapping characters from conflicting backgrounds in a single room, it challenges rigid nationalist tropes and explores human connection across ethnic lines. However, the work is narrow in its demographic scope. It lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities, female characters, and individuals with disabilities, focusing almost exclusively on male combatant dynamics. Ultimately, the film trades broad social representation for a concentrated look at how specific cultural identities collide under pressure.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.