
Funny Money
2006

1983
PG-13Director
Zale Magder
Runtime
78 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Burt, a clever ex-con, has changed his identity and has managed to land a job as a deputy in small town in upstate New York. On the 4th of July, while the drunken Sheriff Paisley is busy with the local parade and festivities, Burt quietly steals a million dollars in cash from the cellar safe in the local rich old widow's house. Unsuspected, Burt makes plans to live the rest of his life in the lap of luxury in a far off place with his attractive girlfriend, local hash house waitress Jeanette. But when a crisis of conscience hits him like a wave of ice cold water, he starts to think twice about his dastardly deed, and how that purloining of the old lady's money is wrongly affecting his friends as well as innocent locals. But will Burt do the right thing?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a heterosexual relationship between Burt and Jeanette. It lacks any visible non-cisnormative identities or narratives that challenge heteronormative standards.
Gender Representation
Burt drives the central moral conflict, while Jeanette serves primarily as a motivator for his actions. The Sheriff provides comedic relief through a subversion of masculine authority.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The small-town New York setting and character descriptions suggest a homogeneous, Anglo-Saxon social structure. There is no indication of a diverse or multi-ethnic cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores individual morality versus communal responsibility within a standard capitalist social hierarchy. It lacks a critique of Western institutions or diverse cultural perspectives.
Disability Representation
The narrative contains no evidence of characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Hot Money is a conventional 1980s crime comedy that prioritizes a traditional moral arc over social complexity. The plot centers on a male protagonist's internal struggle after a theft, utilizing standard genre tropes. The film's social landscape is largely homogeneous, reflecting the era's typical small-town depictions. It lacks intersectional depth, focusing instead on individual agency and established social hierarchies. Ultimately, the production adheres to mid-century narrative structures, offering little disruption to traditional gender, racial, or sexual identity norms.

2006

1970

1996

1964

1978

1977

1974

2018

1992

1997

1999

1968
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.