
Lewis Black: Red, White & Screwed
2006

2004
TV-MADirector
Paul Miller
Runtime
58 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Lewis Black goes on tirade after tirade about stupidity in America. He covers everything from corporate greed and Martha Stewart to WMDs and homeland security.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The solo monologue format limits opportunities for diverse character interactions or non-cisnormative identities. While it lacks LGBTQ+ characters, the performance maintains a neutral baseline by avoiding derogatory language or harmful stereotypes.
Gender Representation
The comedy follows traditional observational structures without significant subversion of gender hierarchies. The content focuses on the performer's individual perspective on societal absurdity rather than exploring gendered power dynamics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
A Black performer commanding a traditionally white-dominated Broadway space disrupts historical demographic expectations. This central agency provides meaningful representation while critiquing American institutional failures.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The special adopts an anti-authoritarian posture, critiquing corporate greed and government incompetence. It prioritizes a skeptical, secular viewpoint over traditional patriotism or religious morality.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with disabilities being used as plot devices or subjects of mockery. The focus on societal stupidity remains general rather than targeting specific neurodivergent or physical disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Lewis Black's special gains strength from its placement of a Black performer in a high-status, historically white cultural setting like Broadway. This positioning provides a layer of representation through central agency and institutional critique. However, the solo nature of the stand-up format limits the depth of intersectional representation. The performance lacks a diverse ensemble or specific depictions of LGBTQ+ and gendered identities, resulting in a neutral baseline for those categories. Ultimately, the work succeeds as a critique of Western power structures. It uses systemic absurdity to challenge the competence of political and corporate institutions, offering a progressive, skeptical worldview.

2006

2011

2007

2003

2013

2004

2009

2010

2020

2016

2015
2017
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.